4.7 Review

QT prolongation through hERG K+ channel blockade:: Current knowledge and strategies for the early prediction during drug development

期刊

MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 133-166

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/med.20019

关键词

hERG K+ channels; QT prolongation; safety pharmacology; 3D QSAR; virtual screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prolongation of the QT interval of the electrocardiogram is a typical effect of Class III antiarrhythmic drugs, achieved through blockade of potassium channels. In the past decade, evidence has accrued that several classes of drugs used for non-cardiovascular indications may prolong the QT interval with the same mechanism (namely, human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) K+ channel blockade). The great interest in QT prolongation is because of several reasons. First, drug-induced QT prolongation increases the likelihood of a polymorphous ventricular arrhythmia (namely, torsades de pointes, TdP), which may cause syncope and degenerate into ventricular fibrillation and sudden death. Second, the fact that several classes of drugs, such as antihistamines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and neuroleptics may cause the long QT syndrome (LQTS) raises the question whether this is a class effect (e.g., shared by all agents of a given pharmacological class) or a specific effect of single agents within a class. There is now consensus that, in most cases, only a few agents within a therapeutic class share the ability to significantly affect hERG K+ channels. These compounds should be identified as early as possible during drug development. Third, QT prolongation and interaction with hERG K+ channels have become surrogate markers of cardiotoxicity and have received increasing regulatory attention. This review briefly outlines the mechanisms leading to QT prolongation and the different strategies that can be followed to predict this unwanted effect. In particular, it will focus on the approaches recently proposed for the in silico screening of new compounds. (C) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mad Res Rev, 25, No.2,133-166, 2005.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据