4.7 Article

Endothelial-dependent vasodilation and incidence of type 2 diabetes in a population of healthy postmenopausal women

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 702-707

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.702

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Both postmenopausal state and diabetes are associated With endothelial dysfunction and are well-known risk factors for atherosclerosis. However, the relationship of endothelium-dependent vasodilation and diabetes has never been prospectively evaluated. This study provided the opportunity to assess the association between endothelial vasodilation unction and the incidence of diabetes in a cohort of apparently healthy postmenopausal women. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We conducted a prospective cohort study that began in 1997 with 840 apparently healthy, nonobese, postmenopausal women, aged 53 +/- 6 years, initially with normal glucose tolerance at the oral glucose tolerance test. All participants were followed up for a mean period of 3.9 +/- 0.7 years (range 0.5-6.9). Endothelial function was measured as now-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, using high-resolution ultrasound. RESULTS - There were no significant differences in demographic, blood pressure, and biochemical profiles among each tertile group at baseline or at follow-up review. During follow-up 102 women developed type 2 diabetes. The adjusted relative risk (RR) for women with FMD less than or equal to4.3 (lowest tertile) was 5.87 (95% CI 4.34-8.10) versus women with FMD greater than or equal to 5.6 (highest tertile reference). Each 1-unit decrease of PAD was associated With a significant 32% (22-48%) increase in the multiple-adjusted RR of incident diabetes. CONCLUSIONS - These prospective data indicate a significant increase in the RR of diabetes with each unit decrease of FMD. This could suggest that an impaired endothelial function may play a fundamental role in diabetogenesis in postmenopausal women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据