4.4 Review

Telomere dynamics in response to chemotherapy

期刊

CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 187-196

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1566524053586554

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA006927, CA098087-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of chemotherapy provides an essential arm in the treatment of a number of cancers. The biological feature common to all cancerous cells that sensitizes them to chemotherapeutic agents is their elevated division rate. Rapidly dividing cells, such as tumor cells, are more sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents that act to initiate pathways leading to cell death, a process enhanced in cells with compromised DNA damage responses. The toxicity accompanying chemotherapy is due to side-effects induced in normal regenerative tissues which also have relatively high replication rates, such as hair follicles, the hematopoietic system, the gastrointestinal system, the germline and skin cells. While the side-effects of chemotherapy may be tolerated by the patient, the long term impact of the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy on healthy tissues is only now becoming apparent. Chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity in regenerative tissues requires multiple cell divisions in order to reconstitute the affected tissues. At least in part as a consequence of these extra divisions, telomeres in individuals treated with chemotherapy are shorter than age-matched control individuals who have never been exposed to these drugs. Given the essential role of telomeres in regulating cellular aging and chromosomal stability, it is possible that the prematurely shortened telomeres that arise following chemotherapy may impact the long-term replicative potential of these tissues. This review is focused on how telomeres may be modulated, directly or indirectly, by anticancer drugs and the potential long-term consequences of accelerated telomere shortening in healthy tissue as a result of current cancer treatment protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据