4.4 Article

PDT with TOOKAD® studied in the chorioallantoic membrane of fertilized eggs

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1572-1000(05)00006-2

关键词

Photodynamic therapy; Vascular effects; CAM model; WST09; AMD

类别

资金

  1. Negma-Lerads Laboratories, Magny-les-Hameaux, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The potential application of TOOKAD (R) PDT for the treatment of blood vessels was investigated. TOOKAD (R) (WST09), a novel palladium-bacteriopheophorbide absorbs light in the near IR with a high quantum yield of intersystem crossing. Our study assessed the efficacy of this drug in inducing vascular damage with a view to its possible use in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Methods: Vascular damage of TOOKAD (R) -PDT was studied in neovessels of the chorioallantoic membrane of fertilized eggs. Pharmacokinetic investigations were done by video microscopy and laser scanning microscopy. To induce damage vessels were irradiated with 763 nm light from a diode laser. Results: TOOKAD (R) was accumulated in the vessels in the first minutes following injection. TOOKAD (R) fluorescence was seen predominantly in the lumen and not in the vascular endothelial layer. Although fluorescence was very weak it could be attributed to TOOKAD (R) from the fluorescence spectrum in the circulation. Damage assessment was done 24 h after application of 763 nm light. No significant difference in the degree of damage was observed with different short drug-light intervals (1-10 min), but damage increased with the light energy dose. Closure of smaller vessels and vanished capillaries could be achieved by irradiation with 5 J/cm(2) and a TOOKAD (R) dose of 33 mu g/embryo, corresponding to a phototoxic efficacy of 0.0062. Conclusions: From the results discussed in this work, TOOKAD (R) could be a potential drug for the PDT of age-related macular degeneration in which the growth of new vessels in the choroids can lead to loss of vision. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据