4.6 Article

Beat-to-beat effects of Intraaortic balloon pump timing on left ventricular performance in patients with low ejection fraction

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 872-880

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.07.073

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) timing errors during arrhythmia may result in afterload increases which may negatively influence left ventricular (LV) ejection and LV mechanical dyssynchrony. The aim of our study was to determine beat-to-beat effects of properly timed IABP, premature IAB inflation, and late IAB deflation on LV performance and LV mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods. In 15 patients, LV pressure-volume relations and LV dyssynchrony were measured by conductance volume catheter. Properly timed IABP was evaluated at a 1:1 assist ratio within a 10 seconds time-span. Premature IAB inflation and late IAB deflation were evaluated at a 1:4 assist ratio. Results. Properly timed 1:1 IABP acutely decreased LV end-systolic volume by 6.1% (p < 0.0001) and LV end-systolic pressure by 17.5% (p < 0.0001) due to decreased aortic impedance. Stroke volume (SV) increased by 14% (p < 0.0001), which correlated markedly with a decrease of LV mechanical dyssynchrony (p < 0.0001). The largest SV increases occurred in patients with lowest contractile state. Premature IAB inflation decreased SV by 20% (p < 0.0001) due to abrupt increase of LV afterload during late ejection. Late IAB deflation increased SV and stroke work by 18% (p < 0.0001) and 16% (p < 0.01) respectively, due to increased afterload during early ejection and decreased afterload during late ejection. Conclusions. Left ventricular performance during IABP is causally related to changes in LV afterload, and the timing of these changes in relation to contraction or relaxation phases, to LV mechanical dyssynchrony and to contractile state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据