4.7 Article

An Atlantic lead over Pacific deep-water change across Termination I: implications for the application of the marine isotope stage stratigraphy

期刊

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
卷 24, 期 5-6, 页码 571-580

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.11.008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globally synchronous changes in glacioeustatic sea-level provide a particularly useful stratigraphic reference in the study of glacial-interglacial climate change, and form the basis for the marine isotope stage (MIS) system, which posits a dominant glacioeustatic signal in benthic foraminferal delta(18)O. However, benthic delta(18)O strictly does not represent a pure sea-level record, and it is shown here that, due to local changes in deep-water hydrography, the MIS 2/1 boundary (i.e. benthic delta(18)O change) occurred similar to 4000 years later in the deep eastern equatorial Pacific than in the deep Northeast Atlantic. This discrepancy is too large to be attributed entirely to the Pacific lag that may be expected due to the mixing time of the ocean basins. Instead, multiple proxies (including benthic foraminiferal Mg/Ca) suggest that the large offset in benthic delta(18)O most probably resulted from a late rise in deep-water temperature at the Pacific site and a series of coupled deep-water temperature and delta(18)O changes at the Northeast Atlantic site. These findings have important implications for the application of the MIS stratigraphy and the interpretation of benthic delta(18)O records in general, as they show that benthic delta(18)O fluctuations and MIS boundaries from different hydrological settings may be significantly diachronous. These results call into question the leads and lags that we might infer from a 'naive' interpretation of benthic delta(18)O as a sea-level proxy, with a direct bearing on the mechanisms that we may propose to explain glacial-interglacial climate transitions. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据