4.7 Article

Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction of uncertain etiology, using late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.037

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the feasibility of using late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to distinguish left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction related or not to coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with heart failure (HF) but without clinical suspicion of CAD as the underlying cause. BACKGROUND In patients with known CAD, LGE-CMR is capable of distinguishing LV systolic dysfunction related to CAD from dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS Seventy-one patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction, without a previous history of myocardial infarction, with neither Q waves nor clinical data suggesting CAD, underwent both LGE-CMR and coronary angiography. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (37%) had angiographically proven CAD (greater than or equal to 70% stenosis of a major epicardial vessel) (angio, [+] group), and 45 (63%) had unobstructed coronary arteries (angio [-] group). Twenty-one patients in the angio (+) group (21 of 26, 81%) showed subendocardial and/or transmural enhancement, whereas only 4 (9%) of 45 in the angio (-) group showed it (p < 0.001). In 7 patients (7 of 71, 10%), we found a diffierent pattern of mid-wall enhancement - namely, 3 of 26 patients in the angio, (+) group and 4 of 45 in the angio (-) group (11% vs. 9%, p = 0.7). Mid-wall enhancement in the angio, (+) group was distributed in segments other than those which had subendocardial enhancement. CONCLUSIONS In patients with HF and LV systolic dysfunction without clinical suspicion of CAD, LGE-CMR is an excellent tool for classifying patients in relation to the presence or absence of underlying CAD. Thus, CMR might offer a valid alternative to coronary angiography for the detection of CAD in these patients. (C) 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据