4.7 Article

Incidence of type 2 diabetes in the randomized multiple risk factor intervention trial

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 142, 期 5, 页码 313-322

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-5-200503010-00006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL68140] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: weight loss and increased physical exercise reduce the risk for diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance. Randomized trial evidence on the effect of these interventions on people without impaired glucose tolerance is lacking. Objective: To examine the influence of a comprehensive intervention program on the risk for developing diabetes in men without impaired glucose tolerance and in a post hoc subgroup analysis by baseline cigarette smoking status. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: 22 clinical centers for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Participants: 12 866 men age 35 to 57 years at risk for cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned to either a special intervention or usual care group and followed for 6 to 7 years; this report focuses on 11 827 men without diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance at entry for whom follow-up glucose measurements were available. Measurements: Cardiovascular disease risk factors, fasting blood glucose levels, and diabetes medication history were assessed before randomization and annually. Intervention: Men in the special intervention group were counseled to change diet (reduce saturated fat, cholesterol, and calorie intake), to stop smoking, and to increase physical activity. Blood pressure was treated more intensively in the special intervention group than in the usual care group. Results: 11.5% of the special intervention group and 10.8% of the usual care group developed diabetes over 6 years of follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% Cl, 0.96 to 1.20]). The special intervention-usual care hazard ratio for diabetes was 1.26 (Cl, 1.10 to 1.45) among smokers (63%) and 0.82 (Cl, 0.68 to 0.98) among nonsmokers (37%). These estimates differed significantly (P = 0.0003). Weight gain after smoking cessation and the use of anti hypertensive drugs may have counterbalanced the beneficial effect of the lifestyle intervention for the special intervention group smokers, while the lifestyle intervention was beneficial among nonsmokers. Conclusions: In nonsmokers, an intervention program that included nutrition counseling to produce reductions in weight, serum cholesterol, and (along with anti hypertensive medication) blood pressure reduced the risk for diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据