4.3 Article

Use of rope devices to describe and explain the feedlot ecology of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by time and place

期刊

FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 50-60

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.50

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is an important pathogen of humans, and cattle populations serve as an important reservoir for human exposure. The organism is ubiquitous to feedlot cattle populations, although the nature of its occurrence is quite dynamic. Why E. coli O157:H7 varies by time and place in fed cattle is poorly understood. This study was designed to describe and explain the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 by pen-level factors of time and place. From each pen, we cultured seven ropes placed within pens for cattle to rub and chew (ROPES), in order to classify the pens as high or low prevalence in longitudinal studies conducted during the summer and winter feeding periods of 2 full years. We observed differences in occurrence of ROPES-positive pens by season, weeks within season, and feedyard. ROPES-positive pens clustered temporally. Factors associated with ROPES-positive pen-weeks during both the summer and winter feeding periods were feedyard, prior 7-day mean air temperature, recovery of E. coli O157:H7 from the composite fecal sample, and recovery of E. coli O157:H7 from the water tank. Pens of summer-fed cattle were less likely to be ROPES-positive for E. coli O157:H7 if the ROPES were positive for Salmonella spp. The condition of the pen surface was associated with the likelihood for winter-fed pens of cattle to be ROPES-positive. We were able to monitor these pens of cattle using ROPES at minimal cost and without disturbing individual cattle. These observations improve our understanding of the ecology of E. coli O157:H7 in fed cattle, and also illustrate the importance of designing and analyzing observational studies and clinical trials to account for time- and place-dependent variables that affect the probability of detecting E. coli O157:H7.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据