4.7 Article

Rational engineering of Cel5E from Clostridium thermocellum to improve its thermal stability and catalytic activity

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 102, 期 19, 页码 8389-8402

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9204-1

关键词

Clostridium thermocellum; celH; Cel5E; Rational mutagenesis; Activity

资金

  1. Iranian National Institute of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
  2. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [96003289]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The celH gene from Clostridium thermocellum encodes a protein containing 900 residues and three components, including Cel5E, Lic26a, and carbohydrate-binding domains. Cel5E is a member of the glycoside hydrolase-5 family and is a bifunctional xylanase/cellulase enzyme. We targeted a semi-hydrophobic pocket near the Cel5E active site and theoretically screened mutated variants for enhanced levels of thermal stability. Cel5E mutations were inserted into celH by overlapping polymerase chain reaction, followed by expression of wild-type and mutant enzymes in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) and purification by affinity chromatography. Thermal-stabilizing mutations were subjected to molecular dynamics simulation, and measurement of the in vacuo potential energy, van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, and net nonbonded potential energies obtained an overall binding affinity of - 64.964 KJ/mol for wild-type Cel5E and - 176.148, - 200.921, and - 120.038 KJ/mol for the N94F, N94W, and E133F mutants, respectively. Additionally, the N94W, N94F, E133F, and N94A variants exhibited 1.92-, 1.29-, 1.1-, and 1.15-fold better carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) and 1.46-, 1.29-, 1.11-, and 1.12-fold better beta-glucanase activity on barley beta-glucan relative to the wild-type enzyme. Interestingly, the optimal temperature for CMCase activity by the N94W variant was shifted 2 degrees C higher than that for the wild-type enzyme. Mutated variants showed improved CMCase and beta-glucanase activity and shifted toward higher temperature of maximum activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据