4.7 Article

Response of Acacia species to disturbance by roadworks in roadside environments in southern New South Wales, Australia

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 122, 期 2, 页码 231-242

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.012

关键词

fragmentation; resprouting; shrubs; soil disturbance; woodlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disturbances from road management activities are often considered to be a major threat to plants in roadside environments, however effects may not be deleterious to all plants. The post-disturbance response of three Acacia species with different life-history attributes was compared in four road reserves impacted by soil disturbance from grading activities. Recovery of acacias to grading was variable. however basal resprouting, root suckering and seedling emergence led to a 6.2% population increase for all road reserves combined. In two road reserves, there was significant resprouting of the facultative seeder A. decora, and 2 years after disturbance, resprouts reached mean heights of 71 and 74 cm. One year after disturbance, 71% of A. decora resprouts flowered and 49% also set viable seed, and there was a significant positive relationship between flowers produced and viable seed set. Similarly, 65% of resprouts of the facultative seeder A. montana flowered but only 10% set viable seed. In contrast, there was patchy seedling emergence of the obligate seeder A. pycnantha and to a lesser extent A. montana, and seedlings did not reach reproductive maturity I year after disturbance. Drought most likely reduced seedling numbers, as seedlings were only recorded in shaded road reserves, where additional water was applied from roadworks activities. Grading of roadside environments appears to favour plants with strong resprouting ability, and persistence of Acacia populations will depend on the timing of soil disturbances from grading activities in relation to species life-history attributes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据