4.3 Article

Creatinine versus specific gravity-adjusted urinary cadmium concentrations

期刊

BIOMARKERS
卷 10, 期 2-3, 页码 117-126

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13547500500159001

关键词

creatinine; specific gravity; cadmium; adjustment for dilution; urine analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim was to assess how urinary creatinine is affected by age, gender, body size and meat intake, and to determine to what extent such factors might affect the creatinine adjustment of urinary cadmium. The study was based on three Swedish studies: ( 1) 67 non-smoking women aged 20 - 50 years (24-h urine samples); ( 2) 289 men and 434 women aged 16 - 81 years ( spot urine samples); and ( 3) 98 men and 105 women aged 19 - 72 years ( spot urine samples). The effects of age, body surface area ( as an indicator of muscle mass), and meat intake on urinary creatinine and cadmium were analysed using multiple regression analyses. Gender- and age-related variations in urinary creatinine and cadmium adjusted for creatinine or specific gravity were compared by ANOVA or ANCOVA. In the multiple regression analyses, body surface area, gender, age and meat intake were the major determinants of urinary creatinine. Urinary cadmium adjusted for creatinine and specific gravity were also dependent on body size, gender and age. Urinary cadmium adjusted for creatinine was 15 - 92% higher in women or older individuals than in men or younger individuals. Women or older individuals had - 3 to 79% higher urinary cadmium adjusted for specific gravity than men or younger individuals had, and such a difference between gender or age group was less obvious in specific gravity adjustment than in creatinine adjustment. Thus, urinary cadmium adjusted for creatinine is more affected by age, gender, body size and meat intake than is specific gravity adjustment. When comparing individuals or populations with large differences in muscle mass or meat intake, such effects can be especially important. In such studies, specific gravity adjustment seems to be more appropriate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据