4.2 Article

Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology

期刊

ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 35-39

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/advan.00026.2004

关键词

computer-assisted learning; distance learning; distributed learning; hybrid course; online education; information technology; medical education; Web-based learning; problem-based learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

World Wide Web (Web)- based learning (WBL), problem-based learning (PBL), and collaborative learning are at present the most powerful educational options in higher education. A blended (hybrid) course combines traditional face-to-face and WBL approaches in an educational environment that is nonspecific as to time and place. To provide educational services for an undergraduate second-year elective course in acid-base physiology, a rich, student-centered educational Web-environment designed to support PBL was created by using Web Course Tools courseware. The course is designed to require students to work in small collaborative groups using problem solving activities to develop topic understanding. The aim of the study was to identify the impact of the blended WBL-PBL-collaborative learning environment on student learning outcomes. Student test scores and satisfaction survey results from a blended WBL-PBL-based test group (n = 37) were compared with a control group whose instructional opportunities were from a traditional in-class PBL model (n = 84). WBL students scored significantly (t = 3.3952; P = 0.0009) better on the final acid-base physiology examination and expressed a positive attitude to the new learning environment in the satisfaction survey. Expressed in terms of a difference effect, the mean of the treated group (WBL) is at the 76th percentile of the untreated (face-to-face) group, which stands for a medium effect size. Thus student progress in the blended WBL-PBL collaborative environment was positively affected by the use of technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据