4.6 Article

Seasonality of invasive pneumococcal disease: Temporal relation to documented influenza and respiratory syncytial viral circulation

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 285-291

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.09.016

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; epidemiology; seasonality; influenza; respiratory syncytial virus

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-017697] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [UO1HL72471] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI001582] Funding Source: Medline
  4. ODCDC CDC HHS [U50/CCU416123] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Seasonal fluctuation in the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease has been attributed to winter virus exposure (e.g., influenza and respiratory syncytial virus [RSV]). Evidence of a direct correlation of invasive pneumococcal disease with laboratory-confirmed virus seasons, however, is limited. Using two prospective surveillance networks, the temporal relation between invasive pneumococcal disease and isolation of circulating winter viruses was explored. METHODS: Episodes of invasive pneumococcal disease in five Tennessee counties were collected prospectively from January 1995 through June 2002. Virus seasons were defined using prospective laboratory-based surveillance. Correlation between weekly identification of invasive pneumococcal disease and laboratory isolation of RSV and influenza, as well as comparisons of the frequencies of invasive pneumococcal disease episodes during viral and nonviral seasons were determined. RESULTS: A total of 4147 invasive pneumococcal disease episodes were identified. Weekly frequency of invasive pneumococcal disease correlated directly with the weekly frequency of isolation of RSV (r = 0.56, P < 0.001) and influenza (r = 0.40, P < 0.001). The average weekly frequency of invasive pneumococcal disease during RSV and influenza seasons was higher than during the nonviral seasons (P < 0.001 for each year).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据