4.7 Article

Identification of PTSFru as the major fructose uptake system of Clostridium acetobutylicum

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 16, 页码 7161-7172

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5809-1

关键词

Clostridium acetobutylicum; Sugar transport; Phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system; PTSFru; PTSManI; PTSManII; Growth on fructose; Glucose; Mannose

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through SysMO project COSMIC2 [0315872D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a member of the saccharolytic clostridia, a variety of different carbohydrates like glucose, fructose, or mannose can be used as carbon and energy source by Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. Thirteen phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase systems (PTS) have been identified in C. acetobutylicum, which are likely to be responsible for the uptake of hexoses, hexitols, or disaccharides. Here, we focus on three PTS which are expected to be involved in the uptake of fructose, PTSFru, PTSManI, and PTSManII. To analyze their individual functions, each PTS was inactivated via homologous recombination or insertional mutagenesis. Standardized comparative batch fermentations in a synthetic medium with glucose, fructose, or mannose as sole carbon source identified PTSFru as primary uptake system for fructose, whereas growth with fructose was not impaired in PTSManI and slightly altered in PTSManII-deficient strains of C. acetobutylicum. The inactivation of PTSManI resulted in slower growth on mannose whereas the loss of PTSManII revealed no phenotype during growth on mannose. This is the first time that it has been shown that PTSFru and PTSManI of C. acetobutylicum are directly involved in fructose and mannose uptake, respectively. Moreover, comprehensive comparison of the fermentation products revealed that the loss of PTSFru prevents the solvent shift as no butanol and only basic levels of acetone and ethanol could be determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据