4.6 Article

Hyperthermia: a failure of the motor cortex and the muscle

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 563, 期 2, 页码 621-631

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.077115

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fatigue is increased during hyperthermia, and torque declines more rapidly in sustained maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). This can be caused by a greater decline in voluntary activation of muscle (i.e. 'central fatigue'). The present study aimed to localize the site of failure of voluntary drive during hyperthermia. Seven subjects made brief (2-3 s) and sustained (2 min) MVCs of elbow flexor muscles in two experiments. Core temperature was normal (similar to 37 degrees C) in the first experiment, and elevated (similar to 38.5 degrees C) by passive heating in the second. During some MVCs, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (TMS) was delivered, and the evoked torque (superimposed twitch) and EMG responses were measured. During hyperthermia, voluntary torque was reduced by similar to 2.4% during brief MVCs (P = 0.03), and decreased further (similar to 12%) during sustained MVCs (P = 0.01). The superimposed twitch amplitude in the sustained MVC was similar to 50% larger (P = 0.01). Thus, the ability to drive the muscle maximally in a sustained fashion was decreased, and some motor cortical output, which could have increased torque, remained untapped by voluntary drive. The additional central fatigue was not associated with altered motor cortical 'excitability', as EMG responses produced by TMS were similar at the two temperatures. However, the peak relaxation rate of muscle increased by similar to 20% (P = 0.005) during hyperthermia. Hence, faster motor unit firing rates would be required to produce fusion of force. The increased central fatigue during hyperthermia may represent a failure of descending voluntary drive to compensate for changed muscle properties, despite the availability of additional cortical output.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据