4.7 Article

Characterization of a multi-function processive endoglucanase CHU_2103 from Cytophaga hutchinsonii

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 15, 页码 6679-6687

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5640-8

关键词

Cytophaga hutchinsonii; Family 5 glycoside hydrolase; Processive endoglucanase; Multi-function

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB707402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170051, 31371262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytophaga hutchinsonii is a Gram-negative gliding bacterium which can efficiently degrade crystalline cellulose by an unknown strategy. Genomic analysis suggests the C. hutchinsonii genome lacks homologs to an obvious exoglucanase that previously seemed essential for cellulose degradation. One of the putative endoglucanases, CHU_2103, was successfully expressed in Escherichia coli JM109 and identified as a processive endoglucanase with transglycosylation activity. It could hydrolyze carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) into cellodextrins and rapidly decrease the viscosity of CMC. When regenerated amorphous cellulose (RAC) was degraded by CHU_2103, the ratio of the soluble to insoluble reducing sugars was 3.72 after 3 h with cellobiose and cellotriose as the main products, indicating that CHU_2103 was a processive endoglucanase. CHU_2103 could degrade cellodextrins of degree of polymerization a parts per thousand yen3. It hydrolyzed p-nitrophenyl beta-d-cellodextrins by cutting glucose or cellobiose from the non-reducing end. Meanwhile, some larger-molecular-weight cellodextrins could be detected, indicating it also had transglycosylation activity. Without carbohydrate-binding module (CBM), CHU_2103 could bind to crystalline cellulose and acted processively on it. Site-directed mutation of CHU_2103 demonstrated that the conserved aromatic amino acid W197 in the catalytic domain was essential not only for its processive activity, but also its cellulose binding ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据