4.5 Article

Distinct regulation of C3a-induced MCP-1/CCL2 and RANTES/CCL5 production in human mast cells by extracellular signal regulated kinase and P13 kinase

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 581-587

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.09.009

关键词

mast cells; complement; signal transduction; chemokine

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1R01-HL63372] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complement component C3a causes a robust degranulation in human mast cells. Whether C3a also stimulates chemokine production in human mast cells and what signaling pathway it activates is not known. In the present study, we demonstrate that CD34(+) cell-derived primary mast cells and a human mast cell line LAD 2 express surface C3a receptors at similar levels. Furthermore, C3a caused similar to 50% internalization of cell surface C3a receptors in both cell types. We therefore used LAD 2 cells as a model to study C3a-induced biological responses and signaling in human mast cells. We found that C3a stimulated substantial degranulation and induced chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1/CCL2) and regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES/CCL5) production in LAD 2 mast cells. C3a caused a rapid and sustained extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and Akt phosphorylation in LAD 2 mast cells. Furthermore, U0126 and LY294002, which respectively inhibit MEK-induced ERK phosphorylation and P13 kinase-mediated Akt phosphorylation had distinct effects on C3a-induced responses. Thus, U0126, which blocked C3a-induced RANTES/CCL5 production by 50.6 +/- 2.3%, inhibited MCP-1/CCL2 generation by 85.2 +/- 0.6%. In contrast, LY294002 had no effect on C3a-induced RANTES/CCL5 production but blocked MCP-1/CCL2 generation by 83.7 +/- 1.5%. These data demonstrate that C3a activates divergent signaling pathways to induce chemokine production in human mast cells. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据