4.7 Article

Significance of histological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 214-221

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.105

关键词

pancreatic cancer; chemoradiotherapy; neoadjuvant therapy; histological response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer offers theoretical advantages over the standard approach of surgery followed by adjuvant CRT. We hypothesized that histological responses to CRT would be significant prognostic factors in patients undergoing neoadjuvant CRT followed by resection. Methods: Since 1994, 193 patients with biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma have completed neoadjuvant CRT, and 70 patients have undergone resection. Specimens were retrospectively examined by an individual pathologist for histological responses (tumor necrosis, tumor fibrosis, and residual tumor load) and immunohistochemical staining for p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor. Factors influencing overall survival were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier (univariate) and Cox proportional hazards (multivariate) methods. Results: The estimated overall survival (median SE) in the entire group of patients undergoing resection was 23 +/- 4.2 months, with an estimated 3-year survival of 37% +/- 6.6% and a median follow-up of 28 months. Complete histological responses occurred in 6% of patients. Overexpression of p53 was more common in patients with large residual tumor loads. Tumor necrosis was an independent negative prognostic factor, as were positive lymph nodes, a large residual tumor load, and poor tumor differentiation. Conclusions: Histological response to neoadjuvant CRT-as measured by residual tumor load-may be useful as a surrogate marker for treatment efficacy. Characterization of the tumor cells that survive neoadjuvant CRT may help us to identify new or more appropriate targets for systemic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据