4.7 Article

Improved α-amylase production by Aspergillus oryzae after a double deletion of genes involved in carbon catabolite repression

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 335-343

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5353-4

关键词

Aspergillus oryzae; alpha-Amylase production; Carbon catabolite derepression; CreA transcription repressor; CreB ubiquitin processing protease; Double deletion mutant

资金

  1. Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (PROBRAIN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In filamentous fungi, the expression of secretory glycoside hydrolase encoding genes, such as those for amylases, cellulases, and xylanases, is generally repressed in the presence of glucose. CreA and CreB have been observed to be regulating factors for carbon catabolite repression. In this study, we generated single and double deletion creA and/or creB mutants in Aspergillus oryzae. The alpha-amylase activities of each strain were compared under various culture conditions. For the wild-type strain, mRNA levels of alpha-amylase were markedly decreased in the later stage of submerged culture under inducing conditions, whereas this reduced expression was not observed for single creA and double creA/creB deletion mutants. In addition, alpha-amylase activity of the wild-type strain was reduced in submerged culture containing high concentrations of inducing sugars, whereas all constructed mutants showed higher alpha-amylase activities. In particular, the alpha-amylase activity of the double deletion mutant in a medium containing 5 % starch was > 10-fold higher than that of the wild-type strain under the same culture conditions. In solid-state cultures using wheat bran as a substrate, the alpha-amylase activities of single creA and double deletion mutants were > 2-fold higher than that of the wild-type strain. These results suggested that deleting both creA and creB resulted in dramatic improvements in the production of secretory glycoside hydrolases in filamentous fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据