4.7 Review

Microbial deterioration of cultural heritage and works of art - tilting at windmills?

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 97, 期 22, 页码 9637-9646

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5283-1

关键词

Biodeterioration phenomena; Microbial communities; Biocides; Conservation

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [V194-B20]
  2. VIBT EQ GmbH
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [V 194] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [V194] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microorganisms (bacteria, archaea and fungi), in addition to lichens and insect pests, cause problems in the conservation of cultural heritage because of their biodeteriorative potential. This holds true for all types of historic artefacts, and even for art made of modern materials, in public buildings, museums and private art collections. The variety of biodeterioration phenomena observed on materials of cultural heritage is determined by several factors, such as the chemical composition and nature of the material itself, the climate and exposure of the object, in addition to the manner and frequency of surface cleaning and housekeeping in museums. This study offers a review of a variety of well-known biodeterioration phenomena observed on different materials, such as stone and building materials, objects exhibited in museums and libraries, as well as human remains and burial-related materials. The decontamination of infected artefacts, exhibition rooms and depots incurs high expenditure for museums. Nevertheless, the question has to be raised: whether the process of biodeterioration of cultural heritage can or should be stopped under all circumstances, or whether we have to accept it as a natural and an implicit consecution of its creation. This study also highlights critically the pros and cons of biocide treatments and gives some prominent examples of successful and unsuccessful conservation treatments. Furthermore, an outlook on the future research needs and developments in this highly interesting field is given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据