4.7 Review

Biotechnologies for greenhouse gases (CH4, N2O, and CO2) abatement: state of the art and challenges

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 97, 期 6, 页码 2277-2303

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4734-z

关键词

Biological treatment; Carbon dioxide; Greenhouse gases; Methane; Nitrous oxide

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RYC-2007-01667, JCI-2011-11009, BES-2010-030994, CTQ2012-34949, CONSOLIDER-CSD 2007-00055]
  2. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon [VA004A11-2, GR76]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Today, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions represent approximately 98 % of the total greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory worldwide, and their share is expected to increase significantly in this twenty-first century. CO2 represents the most important GHG with approximately 77 % of the total GHG emissions (considering its global warming potential) worldwide, while CH4 and N2O are emitted to a lesser extent (14 and 8 %, respectively) but exhibit global warming potentials 23 and 298 times higher than that of CO2, respectively. Most members of the United Nations, based on the urgent need to maintain the global average temperature 2 A degrees C above preindustrial levels, have committed themselves to significantly reduce their GHG emissions. In this context, an active abatement of these emissions will help to achieve these target emission cuts without compromising industrial growth. Nowadays, there are sufficient empirical evidence to support that biological technologies can become, if properly tailored, a low-cost and environmentally friendly alternative to physical/chemical methods for the abatement of GHGs. This study constitutes a state-of-the-art review of the microbiology (biochemistry, kinetics, and waste-to-value processes) and bioreactor technology of CH4, N2O, and CO2 abatement. The potential and limitations of biological GHG degradation processes are critically discussed, and the current knowledge gaps and technology niches in the field are identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据