4.7 Article

Discovery of (hemi-) cellulase genes in a metagenomic library from a biogas digester using 454 pyrosequencing

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 97, 期 18, 页码 8173-8182

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4927-5

关键词

454 Pyrosequencing; Biogas digester; Fosmid library; Glycosyl hydrolase; Metagenome

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [973: 2012CB721103]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [863: 2013AA102806]
  3. Knowledge Innovation Program [KSCX1-YW-11B3, KSCX2-EW-J-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 341, 246, and 386 positive clones with endo-beta-1,4-glucanase, beta-glucosidase, and endo-beta-1,4-xylanase activities, respectively, were identified by screening from a metagenomic fosmid library constructed from a biogas digester. Subsequently, pools of 4, 10, and 16 positive clones were subjected to 454 pyrosequencing in different subruns. In total, 21 unique glycosyl hydrolase (GH) genes were predicted by bioinformatic analysis, which showed similarities to their nearest neighbors from 39 % to 72 %. In addition to bioinformatics prediction, nine GH genes were expressed and purified to identify their activity with four kinds of substrates. The activities of the most expressed proteins were consistent with their annotation based on bioinformatics prediction; however, three GH genes belonging to the GH5 family showed different activities from their annotation. An efficient acidic cellulase En1 had an optimal condition at 55 A degrees C, pH 5.5, with a specific activity toward carboxymethylcellulose at 118 U/mg and K (m) at 12.8 g/L. This study demonstrated that there are diverse GHs in the biogas digester system with potential industrial application in lignocellulose hydrolysis, and their activities should be investigated with different substrates before their application. Additionally, pool sequencing of positive fosmid clones might be a cost-effective approach to obtain functional genes from metagenomic libraries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据