4.7 Article

Bioaugmentation accelerates the shift of bacterial community structure against shock load: a case study of coking wastewater treatment by zeolite-sequencing batch reactor

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 863-873

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4848-3

关键词

Bioaugmentation; Bacterial community structure; T-RFLP; Coking wastewater; Zeolite-sequencing batch reactor; Shock load

资金

  1. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2009AA06Z309]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51178002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioaugmentation with degrading bacteria is an effective method to improve the treatment of refractory industrial wastewater; nevertheless there were controversial opinions about the fate of inoculated bacteria and microbial community dynamics. In this study, two lab-scale sequencing batch reactors filled with modified zeolite were used to treat a coking wastewater with pyridine and quinoline shock load, and a bacterial consortium containing three degrading strains was added in one reactor for bioaugmentation. During 120-day operation, the bioaugmented reactor removed over 99 % pyridine, 99 % quinoline, 85 % TOC, 65 % COD, and 95 % NO3 (-)-N with higher resistance to the shock load than the non-bioaugmented reactor. Based on the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism of 16S rDNA, bacterial community diversity increased in the bioaugmented reactor. Principal component analysis revealed that, to cope with the shock load, the indigenous bacterial community recovered to the initial structure by acclimatizing itself constantly to the inhospitable environment; but bioaugmentation accelerated the shift of whole bacterial community, resulting in a far different structure from the initial one. Canonical correspondence analysis indicated that the environmental parameters of pyridine, quinoline, TOC, and NO3 (-)-N had close negative correlations with bioaugmentation; and NH3-N and COD were the main parameters to impact on the bacterial community changes and treatment efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据