4.6 Article

Testosterone regulates PDE5 expression and in vivo responsiveness to tadalafil in rat corpus cavernosum

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 409-416

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.10.021

关键词

PDE5; tadalafil; corpus cavernosum; castration; testosterone; ICP; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the effect of testosterone on PDE5 expression and PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil in vivo responsiveness in a rat model. Methods: PDE5 expression was localized by immunohistochemistry in the rat corpus cavernosum (CC) and quantified by both real-time RT-PCR and Western blot analysis in several tissues. In the in vivo study, control, castrated and testosterone (T) supplemented castrated rats were treated with acute or chronic oral tadalafil. Erectile function was evaluated by monitoring intracavernous pressure (ICP) following electro-stimulation (ES) of the cavernous nerve and intracavernous injection of NO donor, sodium nitroprusside (SNP). Results: Rat CC expressed the highest PDE5 mRNA level. PDE5 was specifically immunolocalized in endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Surgical castration induced a significant reduction of PDE5 gene and protein expression (p < 0.05), and ES response at all stimulation frequencies (p < 0.001). T supplementation completely restored PDE5 expression, erectile response to ES and responsiveness to PDE5 inhibitor. Both acute and chronic tadalafil treatment were ineffective in ameliorating the ES response in castrated rats. Injection of increasing concentrations of SNP in castrated rats resulted in a statistically significant increase in ICP/MAP ratio as that observed in intact rats. In addition, tadalafil did not amplify the SNP effect in castrated rats at all the doses tested (0.06-6 nmoles). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that testosterone positively regulates PDE5 expression and in vivo responsiveness to PDE5 inhibitor, tadalafil, in the rat CC. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据