4.7 Article

Differential responses of ammonia/ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms in mangrove sediment to amendment of acetate and leaf litter

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 98, 期 7, 页码 3165-3180

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-5318-7

关键词

AOB; AOA; Anammox bacteria; Slurry incubation; Acetate; Leaf litter

资金

  1. Graduate School of The University of Hong Kong (Y-FW), Environmental and Conservation Fund [15/2011]
  2. RGC GRF grant [HKU_701913]
  3. State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution at the City University of Hong Kong
  4. Environmental Toxicology Education and Research Fund of this laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of acetate and leaf litter powder on ammonia/ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms (AOMs) in mangrove sediment were investigated in a laboratory incubation study for a period of 60 days. The results showed that different AOMs responded differently to the addition of acetate and leaf litter. A higher diversity of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria was observed when acetate or leaf litter was added than the control. However, acetate and leaf litter generally inhibited the growth of anammox bacteria despite that leaf litter promoted their growth in the first 5 days. The inhibitory effects on anammox bacteria were more pronounced by acetate than by leaf litter. Neither acetate nor leaf litter affected ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) community structures, but promoted their growth. For ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), the addition of acetate or leaf litter resulted in changes of community structures and promoted their growth in the early phase of the incubation. In addition, the promoting effects by leaf litter on AOB growth were more obvious than acetate. These results indicated that organic substances affect AOM community structures and abundances. The study suggests that leaf litter has an important influence on the community structures and abundances of AOMs in mangrove sediment and affects the nitrogen cycle in such ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据