4.4 Article

Impaired gastric emptying of a solid test meal in patients with Parkinson's disease using 13C-sodium octanoate breath test

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 375, 期 3, 页码 170-173

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.007

关键词

Parkinson's disease; gastric emptying; stable isotope breath tests; isotope-selective non-dispersive infrared spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Up to now gastric emptying in patients with Parkinson's disease was determined by radioscintigraphy. The C-13-sodium octanoate breath test (T) has been established for the non-invasive evaluation of gastric emptying with a solid test meal. The aim of the study was to evaluate the OBT in patients with Parkinson's disease and to investigate the prevalence of delayed gastric emptying for solids in PD and the relationship to clinical staging patterns. Twenty-two healthy subjects and 36 patients with different clinical stages of PD classified using Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were studied. Each fasting control and patient received a solid test meal (241 kcal) labelled with 100 mg of C-13-sodium octanoate. Breath samples were obtained before substrate administration and then in 15-min intervals over 4 h. The (CO2)-C-13/(CO2)-C-12 ratio was determined in each breath sample as delta over baseline. Time to peak (t(peak)), gastric half emptying time (t(1/2b)), lag phase (t(lagb)) and gastric emptying coefficient (GEC) were calculated. Significant differences in tpeak, t(1/2b), t(lagb) and GEC were found between patients and healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001), with a 60% delay in gastric half emptying time in the patient group. Gastric half emptying time was different between clinical disease groups (H&Y 0-2 versus MY 2.5-5, p = 0.001; UPDRS 0-30 versus UPDRS 61-92, p < 0.05). The OBT detects a significant delay in gastric emptying of a solid test meal in patients with PD. Delayed gastric emptying for solids is associated with disease severity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据