4.7 Article

Molecular cloning and characterization of a new cold-active esterase from a deep-sea metagenomic library

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 961-970

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-3079-0

关键词

Marine sediment; Esterase; Metagenome; Cold active

资金

  1. National 863 Project [2007AA09Z443]
  2. Key Project for International Cooperation [2007DFB31620]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973665, 30700015, 30873129, 30901849, 30911120484, 81011120046, 30911120483]
  4. National Key Technology RD Program [2007BAI26B02]
  5. CAS [KSCX2-YW-R-164]
  6. Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects [2008ZX09401-05, 2009ZX09302-004]
  7. Hundred Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A clone which conferred lipolytic activity at low temperature was identified from a fosmid library constructed from a South China Sea marine sediment sample. The gene responsible, estF, consisted of 1,080 bp that encoded 359 amino acid residues, with a typical N-terminal signal peptide of 28 amino acid residues. A phylogenetic analysis of amino acid sequence with other lipolytic enzymes revealed that EstF and seven closely related putative lipolytic enzymes comprised a unique clade in the phylogenetic tree. Moreover, these hypothetic esterases showed unique conservative sites in the amino acid sequence. The recombinant EstF was overexpressed and purified, and its biochemical properties were partially characterized. The optimal substrate for EstF to hydrolyze among a panel of p-nitrophenyl esters (C2 to C16) was p-nitrophenyl butyrate (C4), with a K (m) of 0.46 mM. Activity quickly decreased with substrates containing an acyl chain length longer than 10 carbons. We found that EstF was active in the temperature range of 0-60A degrees C, showed the best activity at 50A degrees C, but was unstable at 60A degrees C. It exhibited a high level of activity in the pH range of 7.0-10.0 showing the highest activity at pH 9.0.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据