4.7 Article

Force enhancement and relaxation rates after stretch of activated muscle fibres

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2967

关键词

cross-bridges; BDM; detachment rate; myosin; weak binding; strong binding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The residual force enhancement following muscle stretch might be associated with an increase in the proportion of attached cross-bridges, as supported by stiffness measurements. In this case, it could be caused by an increase in the attachment or a decrease in the detachment rate of cross-bridges, or a combination of the two. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the stretch-induced force enhancement is related to cross-bridge attachment/detachment kinetics. Single muscle fibres dissected from the lumbrical muscle of frog were placed at a length similar to 20% longer than the plateau of the force-length relationship; they were maximally activated, and after full isometric force was reached, ramp stretches were imposed with amplitudes of 5 and 10% fibre length, at a speed of 40% fibre length s(-1). Experiments were performed in Ringer's solution, and with the addition of 2, 5 and 10 mM of 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM), a drug that places cross-bridges in a pre-power-stroke state, inhibiting force production. The total force following stretch was higher than the corresponding force measured after isometric contraction at the corresponding length. This residual force enhancement was accompanied by an increased relaxation time. BDM, which decreases force production during isometric contractions, considerably increased the relative levels of force enhancement. BDM also increased relaxation times after stretch, beyond the levels observed during reference contractions in Ringer's solution, and beyond isometric control tests at the corresponding BDM concentrations. Together, these results support the idea that force enhancement is caused, at least in part, by a decrease in cross-bridge detachment rates, as manifested by the increased relaxation times following fibre stretch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据