4.7 Article

Succinic acid production from orange peel and wheat straw by batch fermentations of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 671-678

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2726-9

关键词

Succinic acid; Orange peel; Wheat straw; Fibrobacter succinogenes; Bio-refinery

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/F016727/1]
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spanish Government [BES-2006-14074, CTM2005-01293]
  3. European Social Fund
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E012299/1, EP/F016727/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/E012299/1, EP/F016727/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Succinic acid is a platform molecule that has recently generated considerable interests. Production of succinate from waste orange peel and wheat straw by consolidated bioprocessing that combines cellulose hydrolysis and sugar fermentation, using a cellulolytic bacterium, Fibrobacter succinogenes S85, was studied. Orange peel contains d-limonene, which is a well-known antibacterial agent. Its effects on batch cultures of F. succinogenes S85 were examined. The minimal concentrations of limonene found to inhibit succinate and acetate generation and bacterial growth were 0.01%, 0.1%, and 0.06% (v/v), respectively. Both pre-treated orange peel by steam distillation to remove d-limonene and intact wheat straw were used as feedstocks. Increasing the substrate concentrations of both feedstocks, from 5 to 60 g/L, elevated succinate concentration and productivity but lowered the yield. In addition, pre-treated orange peel generated greater succinate productivities than wheat straw but had similar resultant titres. The greatest succinate titres were 1.9 and 2.0 g/L for pre-treated orange peel and wheat straw, respectively. This work demonstrated that agricultural waste such as wheat straw and orange peel can be biotransformed to succinic acid by a one-step consolidated bioprocessing. Measures to increase fermentation efficiency are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据