4.7 Article

A new coupon design for simultaneous analysis of in situ microbial biofilm formation and community structure in drinking water distribution systems

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 749-756

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-2510-x

关键词

Biofilms; CARD-FISH; DGGE; Drinking water distribution systems; Sampling coupon

资金

  1. European Union [42444]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/E053556/01, EP/G029946/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/E053556/1, EP/E036252/1, EP/G029946/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E036252/1, EP/G029946/1, EP/E053556/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new coupon sampling device that can be inserted directly into the pipes within water distribution systems (WDS), maintaining representative near wall pipe flow conditions and enabling simultaneous microscopy and DNA-based analysis of biofilms formed in situ. To evaluate this sampling device, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analyses were used to investigate changes in biofilms on replicate coupons within a non-sterile pilot-scale WDS. FISH analysis demonstrated increases in bacterial biofilm coverage of the coupon surface over time, while the DGGE analysis showed the development of increasingly complex biofilm communities, with time-specific clustering of these communities. This coupon design offers improvements over existing biofilm sampling devices in that it enables simultaneous quantitative and qualitative compositional characterization of biofilm assemblages formed within a WDS, while importantly maintaining fully representative near wall pipe flow conditions. Hence, it provides a practical approach that can be used to capture the interactions between biofilm formation and changing abiotic conditions, boundary shear stress, and turbulent driven exchange within WDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据