4.7 Article

Delayed supplementation of glycine enhances extracellular secretion of the recombinant alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase in Escherichia coli

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 85, 期 3, 页码 553-561

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2157-7

关键词

Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase; Paenibacillus macerans; Extracellular secretion; Glycine; Escherichia coli; Delayed supplementation

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2007019]
  2. National Outstanding Youth Foundation of China [20625619]
  3. National High-tech Research and Development Program of China [2006AA10Z335]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-MB-200802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The targeting of recombinant proteins for secretion to the culture medium of Escherichia coli presents significant advantages over cytoplasmic or periplasmic expression. However, a major barrier is inadequate secretion across two cell membranes. In the present study, we attempted to circumvent this secretion problem of the recombinant alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (alpha-CGTase) from Paenibacillus macerans strain JFB05-01. It was found that glycine could promote extracellular secretion of the recombinant alpha-CGTase for which one potential mechanism might be the increase in membrane permeability. However, further analysis indicated that glycine supplementation resulted in impaired cell growth, which adversely affected overall recombinant protein production. Significantly, delayed supplementation of glycine could control cell growth impairment exerted by glycine. As a result, if the supplementation of 1% glycine was optimally carried out at the middle of the exponential growth phase, the alpha-CGTase activity in the culture medium reached 28.5 U/ml at 44 h of culture, which was 11-fold higher than that of the culture in regular terrific broth medium and 1.2-fold higher than that of the culture supplemented with 1% glycine at the beginning of culture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据