4.3 Article

Metal binding of metallothionein-3 versus metallothionein-2:: lower affinity and higher plasticity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.11.007

关键词

MT-3; Alzheimer's disease; ESI-MS; secondary structure prediction; CD spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian metallothioneins (MTs) are involved in cellular metabolism of zinc and copper and in cytoprotection against toxic metals and reactive oxygen species. MT-3 plays a specific role in the brain and is down-regulated in Alzheimer's disease. To evaluate differences in metal binding, we conducted direct metal competition experiments with MT-3 and MT-2 using electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS). Results demonstrate that MT-3 binds Zn2+ and Cd2+ ions more weakly than MT-2 but exposes higher metal-binding capacity and plasticity. Titration with Cd2+ ions demonstrates that metal-binding affinities of individual clusters of MT-2 and MT-3 are decreasing in the following order: four-metal cluster of MT-2 > three-metal cluster of MT-2 approximate to four-metal cluster of MT-3 > three-metal cluster of MT-3 > extra metal-binding sites of MT-3. To evaluate the reasons for weaker metal-binding affinity of MT-3 and the enhanced resistance of MT-3 towards proteolysis under zinc-depleted cellular conditions, we studied the secondary structures of apo-MT-3 and apo-MT-2 by CD spectroscopy. Results showed that apo-MT-3 and apo-MT-2 have almost equal helical content (approximately 10%) in aqueous buffer, but that MT-3 had slightly higher tendency to form a-helical secondary structure in TFE-water mixtures. Secondary structure predictions also indicated some differences between MT-3 and MT-2, by predicting random coil for common MTs, but 22% alpha-helical structure for MT-3. Combined, all results highlight further differences between MT-3 and common MTs, which may be related with their functional specificities. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据