4.6 Article

ICAM-1 contributes to but is not essential for tumor antigen cross-priming and CD8+ T cell-mediated tumor rejection in vivo

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 6, 页码 3416-3420

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3416

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P01CA97296] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [5 T32 GM07281] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ICAM-1 has been described to provide both adhesion and costimulatory functions during T cell activation. In the setting of antitumor immunity, ICAM-1/LFA-1 interactions could be important at the level of T cell priming by APCs in draining lymph nodes as well as for transendothelial migration and tumor cell recognition at the tumor site. To determine the contribution of ICAM-1 to tumor rejection in vivo, we performed adoptive transfer of 2C TCR-transgenic/RAG2(-/-) T cells into TCRalpha(-/-) vs ICAM(-/-)/TCRalpha(-/-) recipient animals. ICAM-1-deficient mice successfully rejected HTR.C tumors expressing L-d recognized by the 2C TCR, albeit with a kinetic delay. Inasmuch as HTR.C tumor cells themselves express ICAM-1, a second model was pursued using B16-F10 melanoma cells that lack ICAM-1 expression. These cells were transduced to express the SIYRYYGL peptide recognized by the 2C TCR in the context of K-b, which is cross-presented by APCs in H-2(b) mice in vivo. These tumors also grew more slowly but were eventually rejected by the majority of ICAM-1(-/-)/TCRalpha(-/-) recipients. Delayed rejection in ICAM-1(-/-) mice was associated with diminished T cell priming as assessed by ELISPOT. In contrast, T cell penetration into the tumor was comparable in wild-type and ICAM-1(-/-) hosts, and adoptively transferred primed effector 2C cells rejected normally in ICANI-1(-/-) recipients. Our results suggest that ICAM-1 contributes to but is not absolutely required for CD8(+) T cell-mediated tumor rejection in vivo and dominantly acts at the level of priming rather than the effector phase of the antitumor immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据