4.7 Article

The concentration of polysaccharides and proteins in EPS of Pseudomonas putida and Aureobasidum pullulans as revealed by 13C CPMAS NMR spectroscopy

期刊

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 197-206

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2218-y

关键词

EPS; C-13 CPMAS NMR; Extraction; Protein; Carbohydrate

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  2. German Technical and Scientific Association for Gas and Water (DVGW)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular polymeric substances were extracted from the bacterial strain Pseudomonas putida and the fungal species Aureobasidium pullulans using three different methods (formaldehyde-NaOH, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and cation-exchange-resin). The composition of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) was analysed by biochemical and high-resolution solid state C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic methods. The EPS yield was strongly dependent on the extraction method, with the formaldehyde-NaOH method showing the best extraction efficiency. The NMR method revealed that when using the EDTA extraction method, about 40% of the EDTA accumulated in the EPS and that was responsible for the apparent high extraction yields. EPS protein content determined by the NMR method was up to 30% higher than the protein content determined using the biochemical (Lowry) method for P. putida and for A. pullulans. The average protein carbon content determined by the NMR method was approximately 70% of the total carbon content. NMR results could be supported by elemental analysis, which showed a high nitrogen content (similar to 10%) in the EPS. The carbohydrate carbon content detected with both methods in the cell aggregates and the EPS was approximately 20% in each. In this study, quantitative C-13 cross-polarisation magic angle spinning NMR spectroscopy was conducted on unlabeled cell strains, and EPS and could be used to quantify protein and carbohydrate of different samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据