4.6 Article

Protein conformation significantly influences immune responses to prion protein

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 174, 期 6, 页码 3256-3263

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3256

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In prion diseases, such as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)), a largely alpha-helical structure is converted to an abnormal conformational isoform (PrP(Sc)) that shows an increase in beta-sheet content. Similarly, the recombinant form of PrP(C) (ralpha-PrP) can be converted to a conformation dominated by beta-sheet (rbeta-PrP) by reduction and mild acidification in vitro, a process that may mimic in vivo conversion following PrP(C) internalization during recycling. Despite PrP(Sc) accumulation and prion propagation in the lymphoreticular system before detectable neuroinvasion, no Ab response to PrP has been detected, probably due to immune tolerance. To investigate how the immune system may respond to alpha- and beta-PrP, we immunized Prnp(0/0) mice that are not tolerant of PrP with ralpha-PrP and rbeta-PrP. In this study, we show that although T cells stimulated by these differently folded conformers PrP recognize similar immunodominant epitopes (residues 111-130 and 191-210) the cytokine profile in response to ralpha- and rbeta-PrP was different. Challenge with ra-PrP elicited a strong response of IL-5 and IL-10, whereas rbeta-PrP led to an early increased production of IFN-gamma. In addition, immunization with ra-PrP led to production of predominantly IgG1 isotype Ab in the sera, whereas after immunization with rbeta-PrP, IgG2b was significantly produced. Thus, both Immoral and cellular responses to these differently folded isoforms of the same protein are different, indicating a possible involvement of Th1 and Th2 pathway activation. These differences may be exploitable diagnostically and therapeutically for prion diseases, such as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据