4.5 Article

Inhibition sites in F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 386, 期 -, 页码 591-598

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20041513

关键词

amphiphilic peptide; inhibitory site; mitochondrial F-1-ATPase; non-peptidyl lipophilic cation; polyphenolic phytochemical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-resolution crystallographic studies of a number of inhibited forms of bovine F-1-ATPase have identified four independent types of inhibitory site: the catalytic site, the aurovertin B-binding site, the efrapeptin-binding site and the site to which the natural inhibitor protein IF, binds. Hitherto, the binding sites for other inhibitors, such as polyphenolic phytochemicals, non-peptidyl lipophilic cations and amphiphilic peptides, have remained undefined. By employing multiple inhibition analysis, we have identified the binding sites for these compounds. Several of them bind to the known inhibitory sites. The amphiphilic peptides melittin and synthetic analogues of the mitochondrial import pre-sequence of yeast cytochrome oxidase subunit IV appear to mimic the natural inhibitor protein, and the polyphenolic phytochemical inhibitors resveratrol and piceatannol compete for the aurovertin B-binding site (or sites). The non-peptidyl lipophilic cation rhodamine 6G acts at a separate unidentified site, indicating that there are at least five inhibitory sites in the F-1-ATPase. Each of the above inhibitors has significantly different activity against the bacterial Bacillus PS3 alpha(3)beta(3)gamma subcomplex compared with that observed with bovine F-1-ATPase. IF1 does not inhibit the bacterial enzyme, even in the absence of the epsilon-subunit. An understanding of these inhibitors may enable rational development of therapeutic agents to act as novel antibiotics against bacterial ATP synthases or for the treatment of several disorders linked to the regulation of the ATP synthase, including ischaemia-reperfusion injury and some cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据