4.0 Article

Simplified quantification of cerebral A1 adenosine receptors using [18F]CPFPX and PET:: Analyses based on venous blood sampling

期刊

SYNAPSE
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 212-223

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20113

关键词

A(1) adenosine receptor; PET; [F-18]CPFPX; kinetic modelling; non-invasive

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[F-18]CPFPX was proposed as a novel ligand for in vivo quantification of cerebral A, adenosine receptors (AIAR) using positron emission tomography (PET). The present study investigates the applicability of non-invasive non-compartment analyses to quantify the [F-18]CPFPX total distribution volume (DVt') without arterial blood sampling. Five healthy volunteers underwent dynamic PET (90 min) with arterial and venous blood sampling after [F-18]CPFPX bolus injection. Area under curve (AUC) analysis and Logan's graphical analysis (GA) were performed employing venous blood samples as non-invasive analyses. AUC analysis without data extrapolation (AUC(r)) and venous GA were also applied on voxel-level to generate parametric images. A conventional two-tissue compartment model (2TCM) using arterial blood samples served as reference method. Regional DVt' estimates provided by venous AUC and GA analyses and 2TCM demonstrated very high agreement (venous AUC vs. 2TCM: r(2) = 0.968, linear regression slope = 0.943; venous GA vs. 2TCM: r(2) = 0.972, slope = 0.906). Although on voxel-level the venous AUC, and GA analyses were affected by a slight negative bias, they were still very highly correlated with the 2TCM (voxel-wise venous AUCr vs. 2TCM: r(2) = 0.969, slope = 0.858; voxel-wise venous GA vs. 2TCM: r(2) = 0.959, slope = 0.867). The proposed non-invasive analysis methods (particularly venous GA) allow reliable quantification of human [(FICPFPX)-F-18 PET studies. In populations with altered metabolic/kinetic properties, the applicability of venous sampling has to be separately verified. The applicability of [(FICPFPX)-F-18 PET in basic and clinical neurosciences will be considerably enhanced by the avoidance of arterial blood sampling. (C) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据