4.2 Article

Phytoplankton community structure changes following simulated upwelled iron inputs in the Peru upwelling region

期刊

AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 269-282

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/ame038269

关键词

shipboard chemostat; continuous culture; phytoplankton; community composition; Peru upwelling; iron limitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of iron on phytoplankton community structure in 'High Nutrient Low Chlorophyll' regions of the ocean have been examined using both shipboard batch cultures (growouts) and open ocean mesoscale fertilization experiments. The addition of iron in these areas frequently results in a shift from communities dominated by small non-siliceous species towards ones dominated by larger diatoms. We used a new shipboard continuous culture experimental design in iron-limited Peru upwelling waters to examine shifts in phytoplankton structure and their biogeochemical consequences following simulated upwelled iron inputs. By allowing the added iron to pre-equilibrate with natural seawater ligands, we were able to supply iron in realistic chemical species at rates and concentrations similar to those found in upwelled waters off Peru. The community shifted strongly from cyanobacteria towards diatoms, and the extent of this shift was proportional to the increase in iron supply. Eukaryotic nanophytoplankton were the first to respond to the iron addition, followed by a community dominated by small pennate diatoms by Day 5. These community changes led to increased biogenic silica:particulate organic nitrogen (BSi:PON) and biogenic silica:particulate organic carbon (BSi:POC) production ratios, driven mainly by increases in diatom numbers with increasing iron. Our experiment demonstrated both similarities to and differences with parallel growout experiments and previous mesoscale fertilization experiments, and suggest that the shipboard continuous culture method can be applied to questions that cannot be easily addressed by either of these previous iron addition techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据