4.7 Article

The thermodynamic dissociation constants of losartan, paracetamol, phenylephrine and quinine by the regression analysis of spectrophotometric data

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 533, 期 1, 页码 97-110

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.11.007

关键词

spectrophotometric titration; dissociation constant; protonation; losartan; paracetamol; phenylephrine; quinine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mixed dissociation constants of four drug acids - losartan, paracetamol, phenylephrine and quinine - at various ionic strengths 1 of range 0.01 and 1.0 and at temperatures of 25 and 37 degrees C were determined using SPECFIT32 and SQUAD(84) regression analysis of the pH-spectrophotometric titration data. A proposed strategy of efficient experimentation in a dissociation constants determination, followed by a computational strategy for the chemical model with a dissociation constants determination, is presented on the protonation equilibria of losartan. Indices of precise methods predict the correct number of components, and even the presence of minor ones when the data quality is high and the instrumental error is known. Improved identification of the number of species uses the second or third derivative function for some indices. namely when the number of species in the mixture is higher than 3 and when, due to large variations in the indicator values even at logarithmic scale, the indicator curve does not reach an obvious point where the slope changes. The thermodynamic dissociation constant pK(a)(T) was estimated by nonlinear regression of {pK(a), I} data at 25 and 37 degrees C: for losartan pK(a,1)(T) = 3.63(1) and 3.57(3), pK(a,2)(T) = 4.84(1) and 4.80(3), for paracetamol pK(a,1)(T) = 9.78(1) and 9.65(1), for phenylephrine pK(a,1)(T) = 9.17(1) and 8.95(1), pK(a,2)(T) = 10.45(1) and 10.22(1), for quinine pK(a,1)(T) = 4.25(1) and 4.12(1), pK(a,2)(T) = 8.72(1) and 8.46(2). Goodness-of-fit tests for various regression diagnostics enabled the reliability of the parameter estimates to be found. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据