4.8 Article

Wnt-5a has tumor suppressor activity in thyroid carcinoma

期刊

ONCOGENE
卷 24, 期 13, 页码 2144-2154

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208370

关键词

Wnt; beta-catenin; thyroid cancer; tumor suppression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stabilization of beta-catenin by inhibition of its phosphorylation is characteristic of an activation of the canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and is associated with various human carcinomas. It contrasts to an as yet incompletely characterized action of an alternative noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway on neoplastic transformation. The aim of the present study was to test the effects of a member of the noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway, Wnt-5a, in primary thyroid carcinomas and in thyroid carcinoma cell lines. Compared to normal tissue Wnt-5a mRNA expression was clearly increased in thyroid carcinomas. Immunohistochemically, a bell-shaped response was observed with low to undetectable levels in normal tissue and in anaplastic tumors whereas differentiated thyroid carcinomas showed strong positive immunostaining for Wnt-5a. Transfection of Wnt-5a in a thyroid tumor cell line FTC-133 was able to reduce proliferation, migration, invasiveness and clonogenicity in these cells. These effects of Wnt-5a are associated with membranous b-catenin translocation and c-myc oncogene suppression and are mediated through an increase in intracellular Ca2+ release, which via CaMKII pathways promotes beta-catenin phosphorylation. Specific inhibition of beta-catenin phosphorylation by W-7, a calmodulin inhibitor, or by KN-93, a CaMKII inhibitor, supports these. findings whereas PKC inhibitors were without effect. This interaction occurs downstream of GSK-3 beta as no Wnt-5a effect was seen on the Ser(9) phosphorylation of GSK-3 beta. Our data are compatible with the hypothesis that Wnt-5a serves as an antagonist to the canonical Wnt- signaling pathway with tumor suppressor activity in differentiated thyroid carcinomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据