4.8 Article

Increased mortality and aggravation of heart failure in estrogen receptor-β knockout mice after myocardial infarction

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 111, 期 12, 页码 1492-1498

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159262.18512.46

关键词

receptors; myocardial infarction; heart failure; hormones

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - Lower mortality rates among women with chronic heart failure than among men may depend in part on the action of female sex hormones, especially estrogens. The biological effects of estrogens are mediated by 2 distinct estrogen receptor (ER) subtypes (ER alpha and ER beta). The present study was undertaken to determine the role of ER beta in the development of chronic heart failure after experimental myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results - Female ER beta null mice (BERKOChapel Hill) and wild-type littermates (WT) were ovariectomized, given 17 beta-estradiol, and subjected to chronic anterior MI (MI; BERKO n = 31, WT n = 30) or sham operation ( sham; BERKO n = 14, WT n = 14). At 8 weeks after MI, both genotypes revealed left ventricular remodeling and impaired contractile function at similar average infarct size (BERKO-MI 32.9 +/- 5% versus WT-MI 33.0 +/- 4%); however, BERKO mice showed increased mortality ( BERKO-MI 42% versus WT-MI 23%), increased body weight and fluid retention ( P < 0.01), higher ventricular pro-ANP expression ( BERKO-MI 27.9-fold versus sham, WT-MI 5.2-fold versus sham; BERKO-MI versus WT-MI P < 0.001), higher atrial natriuretic peptide serum levels, and increased phospholamban expression ( P < 0.05) compared with WT mice. Conclusions - Systemic deletion of ER beta in female mice increases mortality, aggravates clinical and biochemical markers of heart failure, and contributes to impaired expression of Ca2+-handling proteins in chronic heart failure after MI. Further studies are required to delineate the relative importance of cardiac and vascular effects of ER beta and the role of ER alpha in the development of heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据