4.7 Article

The detection of bacterial magnetite in recent sediments of Lake Chiemsee (southern Germany)

期刊

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
卷 232, 期 1-2, 页码 109-123

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.01.006

关键词

rock magnetism; biogenic magnetite; delta ratio; remanence coercivity spectrum; Lake Chiemsee

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sediments of Lake Chiemsee, located in the Alpine foreland in Southern Germany, host a variety of magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), which contain intracellular crystals of magnetite arranged in linear chains. To detect bacterial magnetite in the carbonate-dominated surface sediments and further quantify its contribution to the magnetic signal of the sediments, we conducted detailed rock magnetic measurements as well as complimentary non-magnetic analyses (electron microscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and sediment pore-water analysis). Our results demonstrate that biogenic single-domain magnetite (characterized by bullet- and truncated hexagonal prismatic shapes) is the dominant ferrimagnetic component in the topmost few centimetres of the sediment. The changes of magnetic properties with depth are due to the occurrence of live MTB and the downward increasing dissolution of biogenic magnetite. Moreover, the ratios of remanence loss on warming through the Verwey transition after field cooling and zero-field cooling of saturation isothermal remanence (delta(FC)/delta(ZFC)) were determined as 1.47 and 1.25 for freeze-dried and air-dried sediment samples containing MTB, respectively. These low ratios suggest that the bacterial magnetite chains were disrupted to a large extent and/or that the bacterial magnetosomes might have undergone partial low-temperature oxidation. It is proposed that although rock magnetic measurements are suitable for quantifying the contribution of fine-grained particles to the overall magnetic signal of sediments, complementary non-magnetic methods are essential to unambiguously identify its bacterial origin. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据