4.7 Article

Sorptive potential of sunflower stem for Cr(III) ions from aqueous solutions and its kinetic and thermodynamic profile

期刊

TALANTA
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 166-173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.11.013

关键词

sorption; Cr(III) ions; sunflower (Helianthus annus) stem; sorption isotherms; kinetics; thermodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sorptive potential of sunflower stem (180-300 mu m) for Cr(III) ions has been investigated in detail. The maximum sorption (>= 85%) of Cr(III) ions (70.2 mu M) has been accomplished using 30mg of high density sunflower stem in 10min from 0.001M nitric and 0.0001 M hydrochloric acid solutions. The accumulation of Cr(III) ions on the sorbent follows Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R), Freundlich and Langmuir isotherms. The isotherm yields D-R saturation capacity X-m = 1.60 +/- 0.23 mmol g(-1), beta = -0.00654 +/- 0.00017 kj(2) mol(-2), mean free energy E=8.74 +/- 0.12 kJ mol(-1), Freundlich sorption capacity K-F=0.24 +/- 0.11 mol g(-1), 1/n=0.90 +/- 0.04 and of Langmuir constant K-L=6800 +/- 600 dm(3) mol(-1) and C-m= 120 +/- 18 mu molg(-1). The variation of sorption with temperature (283-323K) gives Delta H=-23.3 +/- 0.8kJmol(-1), Delta S=-64.0 +/- 2.7Jmol(-1) K-1 and Delta G(298k)=-4.04 +/- 0.09kJ mol(-1). The negative enthalpy and free energy envisage exothermic and spontaneous nature of sorption, respectively. Bisulphate, Fe(III), molybdate, citrate, Fe(II), Y(III) suppress the sorption significantly. The selectivity studies indicate that Cr(III), Eu(III) and Tb(III) ions can be separated from Tc(VII) and I(I). Sunflower stem can be used for the preconcentration and removal of Cr(III) ions from aqueous medium. This cheaper and novel sorbent has potential applications in analytical and environmental chemistry, in water decontamination, industrial waste treatment and in pollution abatement. A possible mechanism of biosorption of Cr(III) ions onto the sunflower stem has been proposed. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据