4.4 Article

Effects of SolCD39, a novel inhibitor of platelet aggregation, on platelet deposition and aggregation after PTCA in a porcine model

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 115-122

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-005-1381-y

关键词

balloon angioplasty; platelets; thrombosis; nucleotidases; platelet activation; ADP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: This study evaluated CD39 in a porcine model of balloon angioplasty and in plasma of patients undergoing percutaneous intervention. CD39 (E-NTPDase1), is the endothelial ecto-ADPase inhibiting platelet function via hydrolysis of released platelet ADP. Methods and Results: A recombinant soluble form of CD39 (solCD39) given intravenously to pigs had an elimination half life of 5-7 days, increased the bleeding time to an extent similar to aspirin, and inhibits platelet aggregation by > 90%. Platelet counts and clot retraction remained normal following solCD39 administration. In a pig model of acute coronary balloon injury, solCD39 resulted in non-statistically significant decreases in platelet (7.7 +/- 1.4 versus 11.7 +/- 3.4) and fibrin (3.5 +/- 0.4 versus 4.2 +/- 0.7) deposition ratios. Adding ex vivo to human platelet rich plasma (PRP) solCD39 produced nearly 100% inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. A dose-response effect of solCD39 on platelet aggregation induced by collagen or a thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP(SFLLRN)) was noted in PRP obtained from volunteers and patients receiving aspirin, clopidogrel or ticlopidine. SolCD39 also provided additional and complete inhibition of TRAP-induced platelet aggregation in PRP from patients who had received abciximab, aspirin and clopidogrel. Conclusions: SolCD39, a novel inhibitor of platelet activation and recruitment with a relatively long half-life appears to be well tolerated and is a potent inhibitor of ADP-, collagen-, or TRAP-induced platelet activation. Its potential use in percutaneous coronary intervention requires further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据