3.8 Article

Insulin sensitivity determines the effectiveness of dietary macronutrient composition on weight loss in obese women

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 703-709

出版社

NORTH AMER ASSOC STUDY OBESITY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2005.79

关键词

CHO; fat; insulin resistance

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR16185, M01 RR00051] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK48520] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether macronutrient composition of a hypocaloric diet can enhance its effectiveness and whether insulin sensitivity (Si) affects the response to hypocaloric diets. Research Methods and Procedures: Obese nondiabetic insulin-sensitive (fasting insulin < 10 mu U/mL; n = 12) and obese nondiabetic insulin-resistant (fasting insulin > 15 mu U/mL; n = 9) women (23 to 53 years old) were randomized to either a high carbohydrate (CHO) (HQ/low fat (LF) (60% CHO, 20% fat) or low CHO (LC)/high fat (HF) (40% CHO, 40% fat) hypocaloric diet. Primary outcome measures after a 16-week dietary intervention were: changes in body weight (BW), Si, resting metabolic rate, and fasting lipids. Results: Insulin-sensitive women on the HC/LF diet lost 13.5 +/- 1.2% (p < 0.001) of their initial BW, whereas those on the LC/HF diet lost 6.8 +/- 1.2% (p < 0.001; p < 0.002 between the groups). In contrast, among the insulin-resistant women, those on the LC/HF diet lost 13.4 +/- 1.3% (p < 0.001) of their initial BW as compared with 8.5 +/- 1.4% (p < 0.001) lost by those on the HC/LF diet (p < 0.04 between two groups). These differences could not be explained by changes in resting metabolic rate, activity, or intake. Overall, changes in Si were associated with the degree of weight loss (r = -0.57, p < 0.05). Discussion: The state of Si determines the effectiveness of macronutrient composition of hypocaloric diets in obese women. For maximal benefit, the macronutrient composition of a hypocaloric diet may need to be adjusted to correspond to the state of Si.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据