4.5 Article

Exenatide (Exendin-4) improves insulin sensitivity and β-cell mass in insulin-resistant obese fa/fa Zucker rats independent of glycemia and body weight

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 146, 期 4, 页码 2069-2076

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/en.2004-1349

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of the incretin mimetic exenatide ( exendin- 4) on metabolic parameters, insulin sensitivity, and beta- cell mass were examined in nondiabetic, insulin- resistant obese fa/ fa Zucker rats. After 6 wk of treatment, ad libitum- fed exenatide-treated ( EX) and pair- fed vehicle control ( PF) rats had comparable food intake, body weight, hemoglobinA(1c) ( HbA(1c)), and fasting plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, and lipids. Concurrent decreases in food intake and weight gain were observed in EX and PF rats, compared with ad libitum- fed vehicle control ( CON) rats ( P < 0.001). The increases in HbA(1c) and fasting plasma insulin concentrations that occur during the normal progression of this disease model were significantly reduced in EX and PF rats, compared with CON rats ( P < 0.001). The insulin sensitivity index ( ISI; glucose infusion rate to plasma insulin concentration) measured during a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was 224% higher in EX rats than CON rats ( P < 0.001) and 61% higher in EX rats than PF rats ( P < 0.004). The latter difference was despite comparable HbA(1c), fasting glucose, fasting insulin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and daily food consumption between EX and PF animals. In the absence of exenatide, beta- cell mass was hyperbolically related to ISI ( beta- cell mass * ISI was constant). Analogous to the disposition index, the beta- cell mass * ISI product was 63% greater in EX than PF rats ( P < 0.05). Thus, exenatide increased beta- cell mass to a greater extent than would be expected in animals of comparable insulin resistance, suggesting a direct trophic effect on islet neogenesis in obese fa/ fa rats independent of body weight and glycemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据