4.0 Article

A survey of validated automated home blood pressure monitors available for the Internet shopper

期刊

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 103-107

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200504000-00009

关键词

home blood pressure measurement; Internet; blood pressure cuff; automated blood pressure measurement

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Self-measurement of blood pressure using an automated home blood pressure monitoring (AHBPM) is increasingly used in hypertension management. Internet commerce increases dramatically each year. This study looked to identify the availability of validity of AHBPM and the correct cuff size to go with the AHBPM. Methods and results Using the search engine 'Google.com', the author identified 124 consecutive unique sites offering at least one AHBPM. Validated AHBPM were those devices that had published studies showing that they had passed a recognized validation protocol. Each site was evaluated for all forms of sphygmomanometer, number of AHBPM, manual blood pressure devices, all cuff sizes available, additional cost of large adult cuff, number of validated AHBPM offered, and whether the site mentioned device validation. Of the 124 sites, 109 (81%) offered arm AHBPM and 66 (53%) offered one or more (range, 1-11) validated AHBPM. Only six of the 66 (9%) offering a validated AHBPM mentioned that fact; 58 of the 109 (53%) sites offering arm AHBPM offered more than one size of cuff; and 46 of the 58 (80%) charged extra for a large adult cuff (average $23.75, range, $4.80-98). Conclusions Validated AHBPMs are readily available on the Internet. Currently, these sites do little to aid the consumer in purchasing a validated AHBPM. Large adult cuffs, commonly needed by hypertensive patients, are not always available for purchase. Charging extra for large adult cuffs is a potential hindrance to consumers purchasing the correct cuff size for accurate blood pressure measurement and should be eliminated. Blood © 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据