3.9 Article

Low-dose Retinoids in the prevention of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients - A 16-year retrospective study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 456-464

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.4.456

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of systemic retinoids in reducing the incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in organ transplant recipients (OTRs), who are at greatly increased risk of SCCs. Design: A retrospective before-after study of OTRs who had received low-dose systemic retinoids during I to 16 years for prevention of SCCs. Setting: A specialist dermatology clinic for organ transplant recipients at St Bartholomew's and the Royal London Hospital, University of London, London, England. Patients: Thirty-two OTRs with at least I histologically proved SCC. Interventions: Continuous systemic retinoids at dosages of 0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg per day for a minimum of 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: The mean difference between the number of SCCs developing annually during retinoid treatment and the number during the 12-month pretreatment interval. Results: In 28 continuously treated individuals, the mean number of SCCs in the 12-month pretreatment interval was 2.9. The number of SCCs was significantly reduced, with a mean difference of 1.46 in the first year of treatment (P=.006), 2.20 in the second (P<.001), and 2.14 in the third (P=.02). The numbers of SCCs were also reduced in subsequent years, but this effect was no longer significant because of smaller patient numbers. Six patients in whom retinoid treatment was interrupted subsequently had a significant increase in SCCs. Conclusions: Low-dose systemic retinoids significantly reduce SCC development in OTRs for the first 3 years of treatment, and this effect may be sustained for at least 8 years, with a generally well-tolerated side-effect profile. Studies are now required to further optimize their use as a chernopreventive strategy in high-risk OTRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据