4.7 Article

Adrenomedullin enhances therapeutic potency of mesenchymal stem cells after experimental stroke in rats

期刊

STROKE
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 853-858

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000157661.69482.76

关键词

angiogenesis; apoptosis; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose - Adrenomedullin ( AM) induces angiogenesis and inhibits cell apoptosis through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been shown to improve neurological deficits after stroke in rats. We investigated whether AM enhances the therapeutic potency of MSC transplantation. Methods - Male Lewis rats ( n = 100) were subjected to 2-hour middle cerebral artery occlusion. Immediately after reperfusion, rats were assigned randomly to receive intravenous transplantation of MSCs plus subcutaneous infusion of AM for 7 days ( MSC + AM group), AM infusion alone ( AM group), MSC transplantation alone ( MSC group), or vehicle infusion ( control group). Neurological and immunohistological assessments were performed to examine the effects of these treatments. Results - Some engrafted MSCs were positive for neuronal and endothelial cell markers, although the number of differentiated MSCs did not differ significantly between the MSC and MSC + AM groups. The neurological score significantly improved in the MSC, AM, and MSC + AM groups compared with the control group. Importantly, improvement in the MSC + AM group was significantly greater than that in the MSC and AM groups. There was marked induction of angiogenesis in the ischemic penumbra in the MSC + AM group, followed by the AM, MSC, and control groups. AM infusion significantly inhibited apoptosis of transplanted MSCs. As a result, the number of engrafted MSCs in the MSC + AM group was significantly higher than that in the MSC group. Conclusions - AM enhanced the therapeutic potency of MSCs, including neurological improvement, possibly through inhibition of MSC apoptosis and induction of angiogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据